www.public4you.fora.pl

saleyrxgah

Gloor said the last time the state raised the tobacco tax was in the early part of the last decade. “But the cost of health care during that time has gone up dramatically,marlboro lights cigarettes supplier,” he said. Illnesses that come with tobacco addiction and associated illnesses cost Nebraska an estimated $130 million.
“But what that doesn’t include is all the people who are in long-term care and who are being paid for by taxpayers under Medicaid for long-term care in nursing homes with lung disease,cheap marlboro cigarettes, emphysema, congestive heart failure, and they are in those nursing homes because they were smokers,” Gloor said. He said it’s not a tax that all people have to pay ― just those who are addicted to tobacco products. “It is not a tax anybody has to pay,” he said.
“It is one of the few taxes you can say you are not paying it. The way you make that protest is you stop smoking.” “The tax increases had no impact on cigarette prices set by the STMA, as the tobacco producers and dealers had a big enough profit margin to absorb the burden themselves rather than pass it on to consumers,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],” Hu says.
If China’s tobacco tax rose to 51 per cent, from the current 40 per cent, of the retail price, the price of cigarettes would be affected and the number of smokers will decrease,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], according to Hu’s study. The effect of price increases is also weakened by the wide price range,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], with the cheapest costing about 30 US cents per pack and the most expensive as much as 80 US dollars, which makes it easier to switch to cheaper brands,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Hu says.
As more than half of Chinese smokers pay less than 5 yuan per pack,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], a big enough tax hike would persuade many poorer smokers to quit if almost 11 per cent of their household expenditure went on cigarettes,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], says Hu. Given China’s unique tobacco culture, experts say clear health warnings on cigarette packets would be another effective tool in curbing demand.
While it may be good to protect the stakeholders of most industries, the tobacco industry is unlike any another. It makes and sells a product that kills half of all its regular users; causes widespread human addiction, disease, and disability; poisons and destroys the environment; and negatively impacts families and national economies.
Therefore it is ridiculous and illogical for PATDA to request that the delegation to COP4 be composed of representatives who will protect the industry’s interests. Among others, such action would violate Article 5.3 of the treaty, which requires parties to protect its public health policies from commercial and other vested interests of the industry.